For philosophy graduate students

Feedback that reads
like your supervisor

PhiloWrite analyzes the structure of your arguments, identifies philosophical weaknesses, and flags underdeveloped counterarguments — in the precise language your department expects.

Three steps to sharper writing

Paste your essay, choose a mode, and receive structured feedback you can actually use — not vague encouragements to "develop your argument further."

1

Paste your essay

Drop in 100–5,000 words of philosophical writing. Works with argument-driven essays, response papers, dissertation chapters, and qualifying exam answers.

2

Choose your depth

Quick scan gives you a readable overview in under 30 seconds. Deep analysis traces the full dialectical structure, uncovers unstated assumptions, and maps where your argument is most vulnerable.

3

Receive structured feedback

Comments are organized by type — argument structure, philosophical weaknesses, fallacies, charitability of opposing views, and constructive suggestions. Each point is specific, with references to the text.

"The feedback caught a suppressed premise I had been glossing over for three drafts. I wasn't being sloppy — I genuinely didn't see it until it was pointed out in those terms." A third-year philosophy PhD student, UCLA

Not a grammar tool. A thinking tool.

PhiloWrite is trained on the conventions of analytic philosophy. It knows the difference between a badly stated premise and a genuine dialectical gap.

Argument structure

Does your thesis actually do the work you claim? Are your inferences valid given the premises you've stated? The tool maps the architecture of your argument and flags where it depends on unstated commitments.

Philosophical weaknesses

Underdeveloped counterarguments, unclear scope conditions, equivocal terms, and dialectical gaps. The tool does not tell you to "add more evidence" — it tells you which objections are missing and where your position is most exposed.

Fallacies & charitability

Detects straw man constructions, begging the question, equivocation, and false dichotomies. Also flags places where your reading of opposing positions may not be charitable enough to satisfy a sympathetic reader.

Constructive suggestions

Points toward relevant literature, sharper framings, and directions that would substantially strengthen the argument. Suggestions are calibrated to your field — not generic "add examples" advice.

Straightforward. No surprises.

We know what grad stipends look like. Pricing is set accordingly.

For students

$12

per month, billed monthly

  • Unlimited essay analyses
  • Quick scan and deep analysis modes
  • Feedback on argument structure, weaknesses, fallacies, and suggestions
  • .docx and plain text paste-in
  • Cancel anytime
Get early access

Free during the preview period. No credit card required.